What is “Unregrettable Attrition” and What Does It Mean?

The workplace dynamic has significantly shifted post-pandemic with remote work. A recent report has said that hybrid work models are becoming the norm, with 70% of U.S. companies surveyed adopting hybrid work. 

Since 2020, new employment trends and terminology has entered the workplace zeitgeist. Terms such as “overemployment,”  "career cushioning," "quiet quitting" and “quiet firing,” reflect the evolving expectations, attitudes, and stock-driven strategies in the modern workforce. 

Consequently, both employers and employees are navigating a transformed employment landscape that emphasizes adaptability and efficiencies. One controversial practice on the employer side that has regained prominence in the face of the growing divide is "unregrettable attrition."

What is Unregrettable Attrition?

Unregrettable attrition refers to the voluntary departure of employees whose exit from an organization is seen as beneficial rather than detrimental. These employees are typically underperformers, those with a poor cultural fit, or individuals whose skills no longer align with the company’s strategic direction. 

Unlike regrettable attrition, where the loss of an employee has a negative impact on the organization, unregrettable attrition is viewed positively, allowing the company to replace less effective employees sometimes with potentially more valuable talent. This concept, emerging from broader discussions on employee turnover, differentiates between harmful turnover and that which can enhance organizational agility and effectiveness.

Unregrettable attrition is quite controversial because it can reduce an employee to a mere number, valuing them primarily for their performance metrics rather than their human qualities, potential for growth or contribution to the culture. This approach can foster a culture of disposability, where employees may feel undervalued and insecure about their job stability. Critics argue that it overlooks the importance of investing in employee development and supporting individuals through their challenges. Consequently, it risks damaging morale and undermining long-term loyalty and engagement.

Origins of the Term: Unregrettable Attrition

While saying non-regrettable attrition is more grammatically correct, the concept of unregrettable attrition gained traction in the late 20th and early 21st centuries albeit under different monikers. In our research, the first time we’ve seen these words together was in this article from The Economic times way back in 2011.

“Desirable or ‘unregrettable’ attrition is when the low performers leave the company, whereas regrettable attrition is when the better lot decides to part ways with the employer. Getting the best out of attrition”

While not universally credited to a single source, the concept seemed to have emerged from the broader discussions around employee turnover and its impacts. 

As businesses began to adopt more sophisticated human resources practices, the differentiation between types of turnover became more nuanced. The idea was to distinguish between the natural and beneficial turnover that helps organizations remain agile and the detrimental loss of key talent. Authors and HR experts, including Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric, have alluded to similar concepts in their discussions on workforce management, emphasizing the need for businesses to continually optimize their talent pool.

From Welch’s 2003 book Straight From The Gut, the well-known businessman described his forced ranking and 20/70/10 rule. Meaning 20% of a company’s workforce are top performers, 70% are average, and 10% are low performers. The latter would likely be laid off and be considered unregrettable attrition.

Real-World Examples of Unregrettable Attrition

Amazon recently highlighted unregrettable attrition in its workforce management strategy. 

The company actually uses a metric called “unregretted attrition rate" that the massive company reportedly holds their managers to. implemented this approach to ensure that only high-performing and well-aligned employees remain. This tactic helps Amazon maintain a strong, efficient workforce, contributing to its competitive edge in the marketplace. By systematically managing unregrettable attrition, Amazon aims to foster a culture of high performance and continuous improvement.

Another notable example of unregrettable attrition can be observed at Netflix. The company is known for its high-performance culture and rigorous evaluation processes. Netflix’s "Keeper Test," as described by former Chief Talent Officer Patty McCord in her book "Powerful: Building a Culture of Freedom and Responsibility," asks managers to consider if they would fight to keep an employee if they were to leave. Those who do not meet this criterion are often let go. This approach ensures that the workforce remains strong and aligned with the company's high standards (McCord, 2018).

Another example is General Electric under the leadership of Jack Welch. Welch implemented a performance management system known as "rank and yank," where the bottom 10% of performers were systematically dismissed annually. This practice was based on the belief that continually weeding out underperformers would lead to a more robust and effective workforce (Welch & Welch, 2005).

Implications of Unregrettable Attrition

While the concept of unregrettable attrition can benefit organizations by maintaining a high-performing workforce, it is not without its challenges. Implementing such a strategy requires a strong performance management system, clear communication, and a culture that supports continuous improvement and accountability. Additionally, it is crucial to ensure that the process is fair and transparent to avoid negative impacts on employee morale and engagement.

One of the key benefits of unregrettable attrition is that it allows organizations to remain agile and responsive to changing market conditions. By continuously upgrading the talent pool, companies can ensure they have the right skills and capabilities to meet evolving business needs. This is particularly important in fast-paced industries such as technology, where the rapid advancement of skills and knowledge is essential for maintaining competitive advantage.

However, companies must be cautious not to misuse the concept. Overemphasis on unregrettable attrition can lead to a toxic work environment where employees feel insecure about their job stability. It is essential to balance this approach with a strong support system that helps employees improve and develop their skills.

While it rightfully has its detractors, unregrettable attrition can be a valuable method in the realm of human resources and organizational management. It allows businesses to strategically manage their workforce, ensuring that only the most effective and aligned employees remain.

While it originated from broader discussions on employee turnover, its implementation in companies like Netflix, Amazon, and General Electric has highlighted its practical benefits and challenges for corporations. As organizations and workplace expectations change, time will tell whether unregrettable attrition will be a methodology that sticks around or fades away.

Workforce management and headcount planning aren’t for the faint of heart, and can be especially difficult for small and medium businesses. To learn more about how CandorIQ can help your organization stay ahead of unregrettable attrition, schedule a zero risk demo with our team today.

‍